Showing posts with label Match Fixing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Match Fixing. Show all posts

Sunday, November 18, 2012




By Bipin Dani

MUMBAI, India (TheSportsNEXT) November 18, 2012: The Indian cricket board may have rubbished his claims on match-fixing (2011 World Cup semi-final between India and Pakistan at Mohali was fixed), however, the UK-based journalist, Ed Hawkins insists he had brought the issue to the notice of the ICC.


Speaking exclusively with TheSportsNEXT.com over his mobile from London on Sunday, Ed Hawkins said, "I gave information to the ACSU (Anti-Corruption and Security Unit) in Feb following a second trip to India when I was still investigating. Also, the allegations have been reported from a bookmaker. The book (Bookie Gambler Fixer Spy, which is available from Bloomsbury in India) analyses these claims in great detail and the conclusion is to ask for an investigation".

Ed Hawkins is betting.betfair's chief cricket tipster. He has been a tipster for more than 14 years, the majority at the Racing Post. He has built a reputation as shrewd student of the game thanks to memorable tipping feats like tipping Pakistan for glory at the 2009 World Twenty20, Rajasthan for inaugural IPL glory and a 90 per cent profit on the World Cup in the Caribbean.

He has been a sports journalist for more than 14 years. Twice he was named the Sports Journalists Association betting Writer of the Year. He has also ghost written the autobiography of Michael Holding, the West Indies legend.

"Spot-fixing is possible", he stays, adding, "Spot fixing is prevalent the world over so long as matches are being televised in India. I think county cricket in the UK is waking up to the need to be seriously vigilant".

"Also spot fixing is such minute details that it is almost impossible to prove or even detect. It may be something as minor as a maiden over in an ODI, which is normal. But here are some points to help...

1 ACSU need help from players. Players need to police the game because they know what is going on in the dressing room

2 ACSU are dilligent and work hard but they need more officers

3 Make match fixing illegal in India", he further added.

During England Test matches he writes a live betting blog, despairing at Alastair Cook's technique and turning to copious amounts of cake to cope with the trauma of it all.

Saturday, November 10, 2012




By Sports Encounter Desk

KARACHI, Pakistan (TheSportsEncounter) April 2, 2011: British journalist Ed Hawkins claimed in his book that Pakistan-India Semi-Final in the ICC World Cup 2011 at Mohali was a fixed affair but www.sportsencounter.com had unleashed the truth only a day after the match was played.

Following is the complete article posted on our former website www.sportsencounter.com as an effort by Sports Encounter Desk.

Corruption has overshadowed the biggest crime in sports, which is doping, especially in cricket. Things have been made so scientifically orchestrated that even if one sees them happening one canĂ¢€™t make a final call whether it was all scripted or natural.

A number of cricket matches in the ongoing ICC Cricket World Cup 2011 have been put under the doubts of match-fixing by world media quoting their sources but the latest incident was the biggest match of the tournament, i.e. Pakistan vs India in Semi-Final at Mohali.

It has already been reported by some quarters of Pakistani media and a broader Indian as well as global media that they have found some powerful hints of fixing in the second Semi-Final.

A huge media group in Pakistan quoted its sources in the government as saying that Rs40 billion were shifted from Pakistan to India under the garb of betting money, through illegal banks made specifically for such transfers.

As many as 24 bookies collected the money (Rs40 billion, out of which Rs29 billion were collected from Karachi only) from at least 31 areas of the Capital city of Islamabad and then sent it to India through some cricketers, politicians, and some government officials.

Pakistan’s rate with the bookies before the ICC Cricket World Cup was as up as over Rs12 which went down to somewhere around Rs4 before the Semi-Final match against India where India’s rate was Rs0.60. It has also been calculated by some of the biggest media groups that in case Pakistan won the Mohali battle, 90 percent of the bookies would have defaulted across the world, especially in the United Arab Emirates.

A bookie in India has claimed that there was a group in Pakistan cricket team who kept on doing spot and fancy fixing during the tournament, especially in the matches against Sri Lanka and Canada.

He further stated that skipper Shahid Khan Afridi proved helpless against the strong group and couldn’t even show his grief and frustration in front of the crowd or media, rather he was found crying after losing to India in his dressing room. A dejected look on his face during the match told the whole story, he added.

He went on to say that he knew that India will score just over or around 260 runs, will lose three or four wickets at around 25 overs, especially they will lose two wickets in a quick succession. He added that Pakistan will cruise to 100 runs for not much loss then will lose their way and would be 150 for about 5 wickets loss and then will lose by around 20 runs.

Even the runaway wicketkeeper, Zulqarnain Haider, who fled to UK from UAE after he claimed to have been threatened by bookies, told media, that a group of players including Akmal brothers had fixed the semi-final. “I am not surprised by the defeat because they are groups operating in the team and they don’t allow any player to settle down unless he succumbs to them. The same thing happened to me. No one is allowed to settle into the team unless they are supported by a group and that is what happened to me. Players are not allowed to settle into the team if they don’t go along with a group. That is the reason why Kamran is still in the team despite poor performances. No other keeper would be retained in the team if he dropped the number of catches Kamran has dropped”.

As a matter of fact, these facts were shared before and during the semi-final match by some other people on their Facebook profiles.

Facebook users, named Vidur Naik and Kalpit Babel, shared on their profile statuses, “Bookie update..India will bat first score over 260, 3 wickets fall within the first 15 overs, pak will cruise to 100, then lose 2 quick wickets, at 150 they will be 5 down and crumble and lose by a margin of over 20 runs”.

If we take a look at the scorecard of Pakistan in the said match, Pakistan were 100 for two in just about 25 overs and then lost Asad Shafiq and Younus Khan in the space of three runs and 11 balls. As claimed by the bookie, Pakistan lost their fifth wicket for 142 runs and their sixth at 150 runs. Moreover, at one stage, Pakistan had lost seven wickets for 184 runs, still 77 runs away from the victory and only three batsmen, in fact a batsman and two bowlers left at the crease. Misbah-ul-Haq who was struggling to steer ball into the gaps and was looking totally out of touch suddenly found the form of his lifetime and started taking long route hitting fours and sixes like it was a child’s play. It’s quite hard to believe that on a pitch where Misbah showed how to hit long shots, he along with Younus Khan played as many as 10 maiden overs?

Let me take you back to the final match of the ICC World Cup 1999 where Pakistani opener Saeed Anwar, after pounding leading Aussie bowlers, wanted to change his bat. And the very next ball which he faced after changing the bat, he was bowled.

Can you recall same type of thing in the Mohali clash? If not, then take a look at the highlights package of Pakistan’s innings and watch Umar Akmal’s dismissal. He was looking in prime touch, hitting 24 runs from three overs before the ball was changed and he asked for changing his gloves, the twelfth man came and he showed his discontent over the pair of gloves Ahmad Shehzad brought for him, and the very next ball, he was clean-bowled by Harbhajan Singh’s quicker delivery. Saeed Anwar was questioned and punished by a judicial commission probing match fixing and it would be interesting to see if the incumbent government does take action on this or not.

Earlier in the match, four catches of Sachin Tendulkar were dropped by none other than Kamran Akmal, Umar Akmal, Younus Khan, and once again Misbah-ul-Haq.

Umar Gul, who had been Pakistan’s best fast bowler in the competition, bowled like he was bowling for the first time in an international match as his skipper set him a packed offside field and what he bowled was short-of-length deliveries on Virender Sehwag’s legs going for 21 runs including five boundaries and a No-Ball.

For icing on the cake, please check this piece of commentary of Gul’s second over of the innings by Cricinfo.

2.1: Umar Gul to Sehwag, FOUR, a half-volley on leg stump dismissed by Sehwag with a crisp flick off his pads. He hit that in the air but there was no fielder anywhere near midwicket

2.2: Umar Gul to Sehwag, FOUR, too straight again, not as full, but Sehwag stays in his crease and whips the ball off his pads through midwicket. Still no fielder there.

Now there’s a midwicket!

2.3: Umar Gul to Sehwag, no run, short of a length around the hips, Sehwag tucks the ball off his body towards the man at square leg

2.4: Umar Gul to Sehwag, FOUR, too straight again and Sehwag flicks, this time past the fielder at square leg and the ball races across his fast outfield towards the boundary before the fielder at long leg can get to it

There’s a deep square leg now. Field changes galore.

2.5: Umar Gul to Sehwag, FOUR, that’s the fourth of the over. A slower ball outside off stump. The length was short and there was width. Sehwag waited for it and cut the ball hard through point

2.6: Umar Gul to Sehwag, (no ball) FOUR, the fifth! And it’s a front-foot no-ball as well. Too full outside off and Sehwag drills the ball off the front foot through extra cover. Gul is rattled. Sehwag on the charge!

Free hit coming up!

2.6: Umar Gul to Sehwag, no run, Sehwag hits on the back foot and tries to heave the short of a length ball over the leg side, he mis-hits in into his pad. This game has burst into life in this over. Pakistan need to control the damage.

The momentum shifted immediately towards India after that over and the drama went as planned till a flurry of wickets in the middle overs gave Pakistan the upper hand. However, strange fielding positions and changes in bowling let India move on from 205/6 to 260/9 when only Suresh Raina was at the crease and no real batsman was there to accompany him.

Something of same sort happened in the match against Sri Lanka as well where their openers chasing Pakistan’s target of 278 runs cruised to 76 for no loss where Umar Gul bowled same sort of deliveries which he bowled to Mr. Sehwag. Pakistan kept dropping catches amongst them the easiest of dollies but it was Afridi’s stupendous form with the ball which got them the victory, otherwise the match was done and dusted by a group of players, looked quite evident in the field. Do you guys remember, the  Sri Lankan state television channel had accused Mahela Jayawardene of fixing the match? Although, the claim was later taken back but smoke comes out only where there is fire.

Whether the semi-final was fixed or not, we leave the decision on our readers. The proofs are limitless and smart lawyers can downplay them as well, so we are not making any claim that it was fixed but actually we have presented things in front of our readers how they were orchestrated in a trend.

Should the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) be proactive this time or once again it should wait for the International Cricket Council (ICC) to take things under its control, this is a big question.

After coming back to Pakistan this morning, skipper Shahid Afridi clearly asked the PCB to get rid of the senior players. He said senior players, not some senior players, which means a lot. Was he trying to advise PCB, please get rid of fixers? Time will tell us only as it told us in the case of Mohammad Asif, Mohammad Aamir, and Salman Butt, but the nation has accepted the defeat as they were always ready to accept it at any stage of the ICC Cricket World Cup 2011 knowing very well who are playing in the team.

We also must not forget that initially names of five players were revealed in the world famous spot fixing scandal of last August and our readers are very well aware of the name of those two players who got benefit of the doubt at that time.

It’s time once again to get Pakistan cricket rid of these clouds of fixing and a strong policy should be devised to put a lid on this scandal once and for all.





Thursday, October 25, 2012


By Tasawwar Abbas



Should PCB takes benefit from experience of Saleem Malik?




LAHORE, Pakistan (TheSportsNEXT) October 25, 2012: Former Pakistan captain Saleem Malik has applied for the post of batting coach for national cricket team claiming he was not barred any longer.




Talking to local media on Thursday, Saleem Malik, who was a formidable middle-order batsman, said, “I am cleared and my life ban was lifted four years ago. I am cleared by the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) and the International Cricket Council (ICC) so I can now be involved in any cricket related activity.”

The PCB had banned 49-year-old Saleem Malik in 2000 in the light of an inquiry conducted by Justice Malik Mohammad Qayyum which found him guilty of offering bribes to Australian cricketers in return of losing matches.

Three Australia cricketers Mark Waugh, Shane Warne, and Tim May had alleged that Saleem Malik had offered them huge sum of money to underperform during Australia tour to Pakistan in 1994.

Despite of getting banned by the local court, Saleem Malik always denied the charges pleading his innocence. Malik was also named in an inquiry conducted by Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) in India which resulted in life bans for former skipper Mohammad Azharuddin and Ajay Sharma.

Saleem Malik found some respite in October 2008 when a Lahore court lifted life ban on him but the verdict was never endorsed by the ICC who is still persistent in stopping the PCB from appointing him at any position.

Saleem Malik was a classy batsman for Pakistan and scored 5,768 runs from 103 Test matches besides scoring 7,170 runs from 283 One Day Internationals and he knows what it takes to be a good batsman.

Pakistan cricket is in need of good batsmen as the recent breed has failed to keep up with the international standards and led Pakistan to a number of defeats especially in the overseas series and tournaments.

Earlier this month, the Pakistan Cricket Board advertised the position of batting coach to help local batsmen get over their vulnerabilities in international cricket.

For a cricketer of Saleem Malik’s experience, coaching certificates don’t really matter but the real question remains on his character which has a tainted history of controversies.

Monday, October 15, 2012

By Bipin Dani


Daryl Harper finds it "Impossible" for cricket umpire to fix matches




MUMBAI, India (TheSportsNEXT) October 15, 2012: Former ICC umpire, Darrell Hair was not surprised with the recent allegations of fixing against match umpires. However, according to another retired ICC umpire, Daryl Harper, the result of the match can’t be fixed in normal circumstances.



 

Speaking exclusively with TheSportsNEXT.com from Adelaide on Monday, Daryl Harper said, "I don't believe that it would be possible for umpires to fix the result of a match without drawing attention to themselves. A series of poor decisions would be likely to attract attention and may lead to an umpire's demotion".

Adding further, he said, "However I do think that it would be possible to give marginal decisions in favour of one particular team. Often with an LBW appeal, an umpire has an element of doubt in his mind and in such a case, he usually gives the batsman the benefit of his doubt".

"I imagine that if an individual umpire was tempted by money or other benefits, to officiate against the spirit of the game and against what we know is right, then decisions in favour of one team would be possible", he believed.

"I officiated at the international level from 1994 until 2011 and I was never approached to perform in any way for anyone's benefit. I actually found that the principle of treating every player with the same even handed approach was the only way I could umpire. It was so difficult trying to get every decision correct, I can't imagine how an umpire could deliberately favour anyone", the 61-year-old Australian signed off.

Saturday, October 6, 2012

By Jawad Hussain





KARACHI, Pakistan (TheSportsNEXT) October 6, 2012: You just can’t keep him out of the game! The legend of controversy is back and once again he is no short of yet another controversy. The world’s official fastest bowler in all formats in the history of cricket, Pakistan’s Shoaib Akhtar, who was renowned more for off-the-field stints than his heroics in the middle, has successfully landed him into news and articles everywhere in the world, yet again for wrong reasons.



 

This time around, Rawalpindi Express has finally unlocked his lips over the biggest controversy ever hit the Gentlemen’s Game of Cricket, i.e. Fixing.

Former express fast bowler from Rawalpindi is of the view that cricketers are not being paid high by their respective cricket boards which is tempting them to make fast and quick money through spot or match fixing.

Players from Pakistan, India, South Africa, Kenya, Australia, and West Indies have been penalized by their respective cricket boards as well as the International Cricket Council for their alleged, reported, and proven involvement in the scourge of fixing, whether spot of match fixing.

Shoaib Akhtar told an Indian newspaper on Friday, “Fixing happens in our culture because there's less money, there are even lesser opportunities. Cricketers victimised by their boards return (to the team) to mint money. In 2008, I had no money to even buy a car. I had to borrow money from a friend. I handled it, others go astray. Your friends ditch you, (the cricket) board doesn't back you. They all run you down. So when you return you think 'let me teach them a lesson'. Some are corrupt, but some cricketers are turned into criminals by the system."

The rise of international Twenty20 cricket leagues has very much solved the problem of “Cash-Strapped” cricketers in recent years but still cricketers in the Bangladesh Premier League and Indian Premier League have been found guilty of the crime earlier this year. None of these cricketers were under-paid as mentioned by the Rawapindi Express.

Shoaib Akhtar mentioned, "We (in Pakistan) don't have much money in cricket. I wasn't playing for India you know. I was an elite star, still after playing for 14 years I only made seven-eight crore rupees ($1.35-1.54 million)”.

Shoaib Akhtar represented Bollywood king Shahrukh Khan’s Kolkata Knight Riders in one season of the cash-rich Indian Premier League where his Indian host had sprayed expensive gifts on the world’s fastest bowler and his claim of making only 7-8 crore Pakistani rupees looks quite a dubious one.

Shoaib Akhtar captured 178 wickets in 46 Test matches and 247 wickets in 163 One Day Internationals for Pakistan during 1997-2011 and with Pakistan-India bilateral ties soaring after the Mumbai attacks, he didn’t really get a big chance to make money at the Indian Premier League but one season was good enough for him to enjoy the stardom and razzmatazz of the world’s richest cricket league.

Two of the three Pakistani cricketers sentenced in British jails for their proven involvement in the infamous spot fixing scandal were also part of that Indian Premier League edition. Salman Butt and Mohammad Asif had represented Kolkata Knight Riders and Delhi Daredevils respectively but failed to make a real impact and had to sit out in most of the games.

Mohammad Amir, the third tainted cricketer in that spot-fixing scandal, was yet to make his international debut by then and with he along with Mohammad Asif coming from a poor background does second Shoaib Akhtar’s claims but still cricket leagues across the world give enough earning opportunities to top performers these days.

But as they say, “With Money, Comes Corruption”, things are getting worst by each passing year as players are easily getting lured by financial and sexual offerings which puts a lot more pressure on the governing International Cricket Council and its anti-corruption unit to up its vigilance in all cricket matches, not just the international matches, if they are serious to stop the scourge of fixing in cricket.