Showing posts with label Chris Gayle. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Chris Gayle. Show all posts

Thursday, November 22, 2012




By Saqibul Islam

DHAKA, Bangladesh (TheSportsNEXT) November 22, 2012: Marlon Samuels and Darren Bravo accepted the responsibility with both hands as West Indies responded professionally well to Bangladesh’s first innings total on second day of the second and final Test at Khulna on Thursday.



At stumps on day two, West Indies reached 241 for two with Marlon Samuels not out at 109 and Darren Bravo unbeaten at 85.

The duo came together at the crease when West Indies had lost two quick wickets after Bangladesh managed to add only 22 runs to their overnight score of 355 for eight.

Marlon Samuels and Darren Bravo added 198 runs for the third wicket stand to take West Indies in a commanding position in the second Test.

During the partnership, Marlon Samuels reached his third Test hundred this season while his partner Darren Bravo is just 15 runs away from his fourth century.

Chris Gayle once again failed to impose himself for a longer period of time and this time Kieran Powell also failed to prolong his stay at the crease but Samuels and Bravo bought them time in the middle with some application as the pitch had nothing much to offer to either spinners as well as seamers in Khulna.

Earlier on second day, Bangladesh were bowled out for 387 runs in their first innings.

Saturday, October 13, 2012

By Adrian Meredith


Chris Gayle would be part of any World Twenty20 XI




VICTORIA, Australia (TheSportsNEXT) October 11, 2012: A lot has been written about the 2012 ICC World Twenty20 XI and former cricketers like Alec Stewart has also come up with his selection of the best players of the tournament. Time is now to check out my 2012 ICC World Twenty20 XI.



 

Shane Watson (Australia) won the player of the tournament award after getting 4 man of the match awards in the first 4 matches, before failing in the last 2. He ended up with 249 runs at an average of 49.80 and strike rate of 150.00, the most runs of anyone in the tournament. On top of that, he ended up with 11 wickets at an average of 16.00 and an economy of 7.33, second only to Ajantha Mendis for most wickets. Australia won all 4 matches that he was man of the match in - by a long way. They lost the last 2 matches, in which he failed. This says everything that you need to know about him, really. Nobody else won more than 2 man of the match awards.

Chris Gayle (West Indies) didn't do quite as well as Watson but was such a big prospect that he slots in due to his presence. He finished with 222 runs at 44.40 and a strike rate of 150.00, 4th on the run scoring list. He also took 3 wickets at an average of 26.33 and an economy 7.64, though he wasn't really known for his bowling. He was man of the match in the semi final and also won West Indies their Super 8 match against England. But it was his presence that made all the difference, as highlighted by the fear he brought to Australia in the semi final, just by being not out, even though he hadn't faced many balls, and that, even though he was out cheaply against Sri Lanka, he was still a major part of why West Indies won the final.

Brendon McCullum (New Zealand) (wicket keeper) really only had one good innings, but what an innings it was! 123 off 58 balls, the highest ever score in T20 internationals, and on top of that it was a match that let New Zealand into the Super 8 stage of the tournament, as, without his effort, Bangladesh probably would have won the match and qualified in their place. New Zealand nearly made it to the semi finals, were it not for their Super Over loss to West Indies in their final match. He only finished with 212 runs in total, at an average of 42.40 and a strike rate of 159.39, adding only 89 runs in the other 4 matches combined. He only took 1 catch from the 5 matches, a pretty poor return, but having finished 5th on the run scoring list for the tournament, he was good enough as a batsman alone.

Virat Kohli (India) can do no wrong and is in the best form of anyone in the entire world, in all 3 formats, over the last year. Sure so he didn't top the run scoring list, but he was still pretty high up there with 185 runs at an average of 46.25 and a strike rate of 122.51, which included a match winning 78 not out against Pakistan that all but qualified India for the semi final - if not for some lame captaincy decisions in their final Super 8 match, when the team failed to take risks. Having Kohli in the team is a must. Luke Wright may have scored more runs - and at a higher strike rate - but his 99 against Afghanistan doesn't count for much, and, other than that and a 76 against New Zealand (who themselves only won 1 game), he barely scored a run - while Kohli in comparison scored runs when it mattered.

Mahela Jayawardene (Sri Lanka) (captain) was consistent the whole way through, scoring 243 runs at an average of 40.50 and a strike rate of 116.26, to finish 2nd on the list of most runs scored. The strike rate was a little disappointed but he was important in saving matches for Sri Lanka, such as his match winning 65 not out against West Indies in the Super 8 stage. He scored over 30 in his last 5 matches in a row, though he did start off slowly in the first 2 matches. He was a really good captain too, surely the best captain in the entire tournament. I am sorry but Darren Sammy's decision to use Marlon Samuels to bowl the final over against New Zealand in their crucial final Super 8 match, and then in the Super Over, while they did win, were surely seriously stupid mistakes. Jayawardene made no such mistakes. He may have stepped down as captain after their loss in the final but really he did nothing wrong.

Marlon Samuels (West Indies) was the man of the match in the final, when he took West Indies from 4 runs per over after 11 overs to post a total of 137, which turned out to be match winning. He did pretty darn well in the semi final as well. Indeed, his 230 runs at an average of 38.33 and a strike rate of 132.94 was the 3rd highest in the tournament. He scored 50 in their first up loss to Australia, 50 in their Super 8 loss to Sri Lanka, and a match winning 78 against Sri Lanka in the final. He bowled a bit too but his bowling was decidedly ordinary, though West Indies did win the match when he bowled the final over - and the Super Over - against New Zealand - that qualified them for the semi final stage.

Ross Taylor (New Zealand) scored 147 runs at an average of 49.00 and a strike rate of 145.54, to hold things together for New Zealand for all but the first match, when Brendon McCullum scored his amazing 123. Taylor got 14 not out, 26, 23, 22 and 62 not out against West Indies, that all but won them the game. He scored quickly and was a real danger man, the one who could win it from anywhere and the one that they had to get out to have a chance of victory.







Mitchell Starc (Australia) took 10 wickets at an average of 16.40 and an economy of 6.83, to be 3rd on the wicket taking list, just behind fellow Australian Shane Watson. Starc was considered a fringe player just before the tournament, as the likes of Justin Patterson and Mitchell Johnson had been preferred but he showed just what advantage being coached by Wasim Akram is. He was the best fast bowler in the tournament, in conditions that suited spinners, not pacers.







Lakshmipathy Balaji (India) may have only played in 4 games, but he still managed 9 wickets at an average of 9.77 and an economy of 7.33 to be 4th on the wicket taking tally, and the 2nd highest of the fast bowlers. He had the lowest average and the most wickets per match. His tournament was highlighted by 3/22 against Pakistan and 3/37 against South Africa, both in the Super 8 stage. If only he had played against Australia perhaps India would have won and qualified for the semi finals.





Sunil Narine (West Indies) took 9 wickets at an average of 15.44 and an economy of 5.63, the lowest economy of anyone with more than 6 wickets. He started poorly but in the final 3 matches he took 3/20 in the crucial match against New Zealand to be the standout player, 2/17 in the semi final against Australia and 3/9 in the final against Sri Lanka. West Indies won all 3 of those matches, and only won one other match when he didn't do amazingly well. He was someone that struck fear into oppositions and had an outstanding tournament.



Ajantha Mendis (Sri Lanka) topped the wicket taking tally with 15 wickets at an average of 9.80 and an economy of 6.12, 4 wickets more than the next highest wicket taker, Shane Watson. Mendis even missed a match. One big criticism is that against New Zealand he did poorly (1/48) and against England was even worse (0/40) but in amongst that he had the best return in T20 international history (6/8 against Zimbabwe) and also took 4/12 against West Indies in the final, which all but won them the match. 2/12 against West Indies in the Super 8 stage was crucial too, while 2/27 against Pakistan was pretty decent too. As the story goes, he is unplayable if you aren't used to him but once you are he becomes easy to bat against. Nonetheless, some oppositions just can't handle him so he is very useful to have in the team.

12th man: Saeed Ajmal (Pakistan) wasn't far away but I felt that 3 specialist spin bowlers probably wasn't a good idea and I'd rather have a specialist batsman at number 7. Ajmal did reasonably well but was a bit behind Narine in the final analysis and Ajantha Mendis, while unpredictable, at his peak was simply the best. With Shane Watson bowling so well, I didn't feel the need to have 5 specialist bowlers, especially also given that Gayle and Samuels can bowl if needed, to give 7 bowling options (or 8 if you count Kohli); however, if we did need to have 5 specialist bowlers, or if we wanted 3 specialist spin bowlers, I would have had Saeed Ajmal as my 5th, and therefore Ajmal would be 12th man.

Saturday, October 6, 2012

By Adrian Meredith







VICTORIA, Australia (TheSportsNEXT) October 6, 2012: Hosts Sri Lanka and West Indies are all set to fight for the ICC World Twenty20 2012 title tomorrow and it is pretty easy to get a preview here, by looking at the previous matches in the tournament that involved them.




Sri Lanka:
Beat Zimbabwe by 82 runs (4/182 to 100)
Lost to South Africa by 32 runs (5/46 to 4/78) - 7 over match
Beat New Zealand in Super Over (13 to 7)
Beat West Indies by 9 wickets/28 balls (1/130 to 5/129)
Beat England by 19 runs (6/169 to 9/150)
Beat Pakistan by 16 runs (4/139 to 7/123)

West Indies:
Lost to Australia by 17 runs D/L method (8/191 to 1/100 off 9.1)
No Result vs Ireland (Ireland scored 6/129 off 19)
Beat England by 15 runs (5/179 to 4/164)
Lost to Sri Lanka by 9 wickets/28 balls (5/129 to 1/130)
Beat New Zealand in Super Over (20 in 5 balls to 19)
Beat Australia by 74 runs (4/205 to 131)

The better team in the tournament is clearly Sri Lanka (5 wins, 1 loss), as compared to West Indies (3 wins, 2 losses, 1 no result). Both teams won a Super Over, both against New Zealand, while when they played each other Sri Lanka won easily.

All of this does point to a big Sri Lankan victory - except for the tiny matter that West Indies just beat a dominant Australian side by a mammoth 74 runs, scoring the highest score in the tournament so far of 205. If West Indies play that well against Sri Lanka, they will probably win. The question is whether they can repeat it twice in a row.

Australia's main problem in that match was that they tried lots of spinners but none of them were real world class spinners, and Chris Gayle ripped them apart. Sri Lanka, in comparison, have some real world class spinners, with the likes of Ajantha Mendis, Rangana Herath and Jeevan Mendis. The problem is that even the best spinners are going to be decimated by Chris Gayle - it was the pacers that had Gayle in trouble - though they failed to take his wicket. Gayle simply hid from them, giving the strike to others until the spinners came on. But do Sri Lanka have enough quality pacers? They have Lasith Malinga, who is certainly good enough - but who do they have beyond that? Ordinarily, they wouldn't have much at all but in Sri Lankan conditions the likes of Kulasekera are doing well. Angelo Mathews could do well but so far he hasn't done so well. Thisara Perera has been good at times gone by, but not in this tournament.

So if West Indies play as well as they did against Australia, do Sri Lanka have any chance?

The best chance would seem to lay in Lasith Malinga getting Gayle out quickly. But if Gayle hides from the strike, like he did against Australia, then that may not be enough. West Indies had near perfect tactics against Australia. Sri Lanka will simply have to work out something better. The fact that West Indies hadn't shown that brilliance all tournament long makes it all the more difficult to combat as, other than the semi final, they have nothing to go on, and in the semi final all that they saw was a team that had been favourites for the whole tournament until that match be decimated.

West Indies have done reasonably well with their bowling but Sri Lanka won't find them quite as tough to face as Australia did. Sunil Narine may be a good spinner but Sri Lanka won't be quite as worried about him as Australia were - not that that was why they lost. Samuel Badree is still somewhat of a mystery, yet has an amazing domestic record, and he could be a problem too. But beyond those two West Indies don't have a lot of firepower in the bowling stakes and Sri Lanka would fancy their chances.

The other question, of course, is whether it was a one off. If their effort against Australia was a one off, and West Indies play like they did for the whole rest of the tournament besides that match, then Sri Lanka should win easily. And, perhaps, with Shane Watson failing, Australia were easy beats. Perhaps it wasn't so much that West Indies did well but that Australia did badly.

The thing is that, ultimately, it does get that simple. If West Indies get 205 against Sri Lanka, keeping Gayle off strike and scoring 6s at will, then they will probably win. But if Sri Lanka can thwart it, or they otherwise fail to do that, then Sri Lanka should win. Simple as that.

Dilshan, Jayawardene and Sangakkara are still in form but now Jeevan Mendis, Angelo Mathews, Thisara Perera are all doing well with batting, while it isn't just Malinga that is bowling well - also Kulasekera is. And let's not forget that West Indies aren't known to have figured out Ajantha Mendis quite yet - and he could be a huge weapon. There is no guarantee that even Chris Gayle will know how to handle Ajantha Mendis.

Sri Lanka should win. But if lightning strikes twice, there is a chance that West Indies could. And because of that it is hard to know who is going to win. Will we get a repeat of the other night or will Sri Lanka win? And if we do get a repeat, will Sri Lanka have learned how to combat it?
By Adrian Meredith






VICTORIA, Australia (TheSportsNEXT) October 6, 2012: Sri Lanka vs Pakistan promised a lot as we had two teams that had each only lost once - Sri Lanka to South Africa and Pakistan to India.



 

Both were in great form, with Sri Lanka comfortably beating the team who until recently were world number one, England, while Pakistan had just beaten the previously undefeated Australia, and by enough to make sure that it was hard for India to qualify.

Two in-form teams with in-form players the whole way through! Both with qualify in form bowlers but some big power hitters too.

Sri Lanka won the toss and batted first and it seemed odd that they were batting so slowly. No wickets lost but they just couldn't seem to get it away. It almost seemed like a deliberate tactic though, to absorb some of the quality bowling. But when would they go for it? Mahela Jayawardene at least had some semblance of controlling, managing 42 off 36 balls but he didn't manage a single 6, and only 7 4s. Nonetheless, by the time that Jayawardene was the first wicket to fall in the 11th over, they had lasted enough overs to set a platform to launch. The problem was that they weren't even at 6 runs per over yet. Sangakkara tried his best to lift the tempo, smacking 3 4s on his way to 18 off 11 but he was ultimately out a bit too early. Dilshan meanwhile seemed to be playing the sheet anchor role but he was leaving it a bit too late to launch, as he managed a mere 35 off 43 balls, before being out LBW - virtually the opposite to Jayawardene's effort - and a rarity in a T20 match for a player in a long innings to score at less than a run a ball. Jeevan Mendis had managed the same thing though, on his way to 15 off 18; but these two wickets in successive balls allowed Sri Lanka's two real power hitters in Perera and Mathews to come in. With plenty of wickets in hand they had a licence to launch and they did it, adding 21 runs off the last 2 overs to propel Sri Lanka to a total of 139. But that would be hard to defend. It wasn't entirely impossible but it would be tough.

Pakistan came out and found it a lot easier than Sri Lanka had, easily getting over 6 runs per over and adding lots of runs before Ajantha Mendis came in, and, somewhat surprisingly, mystified the Pakistani batsmen. Imran Nazir was perhaps a little unlucky to get bowled after it rolled back onto his stumps but that started the rot, as Angelo Mathews, Herath and Ajantha Mendis went wild, cutting Pakistan significantly down to size to 4/64 off 11 overs.

Mohammad Hafeez held onto hope, scoring 42 off 40, including the only 6 of the match, but when he was out, stumped off Herath, it looked all over, as Pakistan, at 5/91 in 14 overs, had far too much to go.

But never fear, Afridi is here! He could get the 49 required in 6 overs at 8 runs per over with just 5 wickets in hand. If anyone can do it, Afridi can! Except that he was yet again out first ball. And with his dismissal Pakistan really were no hope.

Sohail Tanvir's elevation to number eight ahead of Umar Gul - who had won Pakistan the earlier game against South Africa with his batting - was mystifying, especially as his partner in that match, Umar Akmal, was still in. But by the time that Sohail Tanvir was out, having chewed up 13 balls for his 8, the target required was 27 off 14 balls.

Now Umar Akmal and Umar Gul had to do what they did against South Africa - only better - and quicker. But it wasn't to be and they didn't even get close.

Instead of 27, they managed just 10 more, as Pakistan fell in a whimper, to lose by 16 runs. Probably the best performer, figures wise, was Mohammad Hafeez but Mahela Jayawardene got the man of the match award in a match that was as much about team tactics as it was about individual performances.

Afridi, though, was almost lynched because of his meek dismissal.

Australia vs West Indies was not expected to be quite as exciting. Australia, who had won 4 of 5 matches, were up against West Indies, who had won just 2 and had 1 no result, to go with 2 losses, including a loss to Australia.

Indeed, even Australia's only loss, against Pakistan in their latest match, was effectively a win, as they got as much as they required to qualify for the semi finals.

West Indies started off slowly, very slowly. Whether it was the pitch, good bowling, or Chris Gayle having his now customary "getting his eye in" we couldn't be sure. Some even suggested that Gayle was hiding from the pace men so that he could launch against the spinners.

Starc and Cummins bowled fairly well - Watson less so - and eventually managed to get Gayle's opening partner Johnson Charles out in the 4th over with just 16 runs on the board.

In came Xavier Doherty who second ball had Marlon Samuels out LBW. Good job. Except that the umpire, in spite of looking at it for a long time, and seeming to be a bit uncertain, opted to give the batsmen the benefit of the doubt.

It was to be the only mistake by the umpires in the innings, and, given that Australia didn't miss any catches, stumpings or run outs, I should now be writing that West Indies were out cheaply and Australia won easily.

That is what is meant to happen, at least. But the ball after Samuels got his reprieve, he smacked Doherty for a 6. Doherty had looked like taking a wicket every ball but that 6 was confusing, especially as it was a good ball. Doherty's bowling looked in many ways like the best of the bowlers, yet he kept getting smashed for 6s and he failed to take any wickets, though had the umpire got it right with that LBW then it may have been a different story.

That 6 kick-started the innings and soon West Indies went from a run rate of 5 to 6 to 7 to approaching 8. Samuels hogged the strike though. Gayle seemed to make a cameo every now and then to smash a couple of 6s, but otherwise it seemed like a psychological game, to convince the Australians that he was invincible, as they targeted the other end.

Australia were demoralised from this psychological warfare long before their run rate started to really lift. Samuels was eventually out, reasonably cheaply, for just 26, after Cummins shattered his stumps, but then Dwayne Bravo looked all at sea, but it was all an act, it seems.

Just as Bravo looked like gobbling up both the strike and balls, he launched, smacking 3 6s, and lifting the run rate considerably. Then in came Keiron Pollard, who is currently out of form, and he did the same act that all of the other players partnering Gayle had done, appearing to be unable to read the bowling while sneaking in some big hits here and there. Chris Gayle finally got the strike a bit towards the end and was soon smacking it to all corners, eventually managing 75 not out off 41 balls.

Then came the decision for who would bowl the final over. West Indies already had 180 on the board and it was a choice of which slow bowler out of Hogg or David Hussey. Hogg seemed the most likely as he had at least managed to avoid getting smashed quite as much.

There was still the option of bowling the mercurial Dan Christian, a medium pacer with a wealth of experience, the Australian record holder for most wickets in domestic matches, who, oddly, hadn't bowled all innings - odd as he probably would have troubled Gayle.

Instead, Doherty got the ball, seeming to be the stupidest decision since Marlon Samuels bowled both the final over and the Super Over against New Zealand. But while Samuels officially won them the match, this one really didn't work out. 61666W was how the over went.

Gayle got a 6 and a 1 while Pollard went 6, 6, 6, before mis-hitting one. It wasn't the first mishit of the innings; but the others, by all of the West Indian batsmen, had gone for 6. This one was caught. But there were no big celebrations.

The average score at Colombo was 150 and West Indies had managed 205. It looked to be about 55 runs too many. It proved to be that way. West Indies copied Pakistan's tactics of an all spin attack to great effect, as Badree got a lucky one that clean bowled Warner - one so confusing that the umpires called for a review as they couldn't believe it had really bowled him, thinking that the wicket keeper must have done something.

Michael Hussey did his best to rescue the innings but he too was bamboozled. A George Bailey cameo looked nice on paper but in reality his 63 off 29 balls made no difference to the total. Ultimately, West Indies won by a massive 74 runs. To their credit, Australia were still going for the total even at the end - they were bowled out with more than 3 overs to spare.

Monday, September 17, 2012

By Fathima Zanaida



COLOMBO, Sri Lanka (TheSportsNext) September 17, 2012: The world’s most explosive batsman Chris Gayle put on show his skills on Monday when he manhandled Afghanistan to help West Indies record an easy victory in their warm-up match of the ICC World Twenty20 2012 (ICCWT20) at P Sara Oval in Colombo.









Chris Gayle blasted 65 unbeaten runs from just 48 deliveries hitting four staggering sixes and five boundaries and showed no respect to any of the Afghan bowlers.

Afghanistan could never prove themselves a good match for their West Indian opponents as not only their bowlers but even batsmen couldn’t raise their game to the optimum level.

West Indies used their fast bowlers to demolish Afghanistan first up after Nawroz Mangal won the toss and decided to bat first.

Afghanistan could only managed 122 for seven from their 20 overs and only Asghar Stanikzai (53 from 50 – 5 fours, 2 sixes) impressed the cricket fans as well as experts with his resilience but none of the other batsmen could support him and the second highest total was 15 from captain Nawroz Mangal.

West Indian express fast bowler Fidel Edwards showed no mercy at all and captured three wickets for 24 runs from his four overs while winner of ICC Emerging Cricketer of the Year Award Sunil Narine also made his presence felt by taking two wickets for just 23 runs. Ravi Rampaul and skipper Darren Sammy also captured a wicket each for 26 and 15 runs, respectively.

West Indies opening pair of Chris Gayle and Dwayne Smith (13 from 20 – 2 fours) started the innings in a cautious manner. Mohammad Nabi got rid of Smith when the total reached 29 in the sixth over.

While the incoming batsman Johnson Charles (12 from 19 – 1 four) found it difficult to pick up pace, Chris Gayle came to his own and hit four towering sixes to pace up the innings and later got perfect partner in Marlon Samuels (15 not out from 12 – 1 six) as the duo completed the target with 25 balls to spare.

Mohammad Nabi was the only impressive bowler for Afghanistan as he took both the wickets for 29 runs from his four overs.